"We have faced problems with the performance." "The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex." "The migration strategy needs to be improved." "Documentation can be improved." "The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw." "In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition." "Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pros » This is one of the biggest features that I find very useful in Sparx." I like that it's similar to Rational Rose." "I like Sparx's BPM features and the way it lets you create the diagram." "The company has become more efficient and reduced its budget." "We have found the stability to be very reliable." "The profiles and ready-made templates are an extremely helpful feature. I like the use of it." "It's a stable and scalable solution. It is also quite intuitive in terms of use. With this solution, you get a lot of value at a low cost. You can work from the framework and go into the details.
#Open source magicdraw software
We are not programming it ourselves, but if you are into programming and developing software yourself, you can go further and do a lot with Sparx. It is quite wide, and a lot is possible in it. You can always increase the footprint of what the thing can do because it's so powerful." "Modeling is a part of my work, and it has a lot of standard modeling languages. "The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks." "Scalability is not a problem. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype." "The most valuable feature is the amount of flexibility that one has to model, which is great for an individual." It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. You can use it for business architecture design.
#Open source magicdraw code
The simulation allows you to bring in code off of an external code that you can write to set up the simulation and execute the code." "The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors." "I think one of the key things is the plugins for integration with requirements management tools like Doors" "When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. It's a level better." "The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface." "The technical support is very good." "The beauty of MagicDraw is that it has a simulation part, so you can simulate your model to validate it.
Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible. Tsykunova, “Study of Data Structures and Tools for the Concurrent Conceptual Design of Complex Space Systems,” in IFIP 14th International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management 9-12 July 2017, Seville, Spain, 2017."I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. Skoltech, “CEDESK - Concurrent Engineering Data Exchange Skoltech,” 2017. Matthyssen, “Application of Concurrent Design in Construction, Maritime, Education and Other Industry Fields,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications (SECESA 2010), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010. RHEA-Group, “CDP TM – Concurrent Design Platform,” 2015. Braukhane, “Evolution of the European Concurrent Design Tool for Space-based System-of-Systems studies,” AIAA Sp. ESA, “Open Concurrent Design Tool,” 2014. DLR, “Virtual Satellite 3,” Institute of Simulation and Software Technology, 2016. Gerndt, “Concurrent engineering software development at german aerospace center-status and outlook,” in 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications, 2010. Vigeant, “Concurrent Engineering at CNES,” 56th Int. Kulkarni et al., “A Model Based Systems Engineering Approach Towards Developing a Rapid Analysis and Trades Environment,” Aiaa Sp. NASA JPL, “Open Model Based Engineering Environment,” 2016. Phoenix Integration, “ModelCenter,” 2015. Comparison of tools for conceptual design in aerospace Tool Comparison
0 kommentar(er)
